Skip to main content

Banjo rim #2 - second layer, a change of tactic

I'm still experimenting with things really, and decided to try a different approach for the next segment layer. This time I thought I'd make a octagon using 45 degree scarf joints. There are a number of reasons why.

  1. I'd had difficulty with the mitred angles on the previous layer, and using scarf joints means half the number of angles to using equal angles each side of the block. Half the angles means the cumulative error is going to be less if anything is off (in theory).
  2. The wood I have is a not really as deep as I would like, and doing it this way means initially I only need to get one side and one face squared. The other face can be fixed after gluing the segments.
  3. I don't have to worry about the length or width of each segment providing they are above the minimum requirement.
On the downside, the glue-up is tricker as I found out later.

So here is how it works out in sketchup
11 inch segmented rim using 45 degree scarf joints
First off, I trued up the mitre saw using a digital angle gauge and adjusting the fence

bang on 135 degrees
Then I cut everything and clamped the pieces to a flat surface.

testing it all fits
When I came to put the final piece it it was a mile out


How in the hell did that happen?

Anyway, I pressed ahead and glued up part of it, and I will use the disc sander to get that final part true later.

One thing I'm a bit annoyed with myself about though is I cut the mitre joints at 135 degrees instead of 45 degrees. This doesn't really matter, but I was intending to use a jig and make layer roughly circular using the table saw, and because I'd need to turn it clockwise into the saw blade this would result in tarot because of the orientation of the grain going into the saw. So I will have to flatten to rough surface first, then flip it over before doing that.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vox Pathfinder 10 and Pathfinder 15 Simulation

I've got a Vox Pathfinder 10 amplifier that I bought a couple of years ago, and I love it. It's a great little amplifier, but I don't care for the distortion channel, it just sounds harsh to my ears. There are quite simple modifications that can be done to this amplifier to remove the clipping LED's and increase the boost of the clean channel (check out Ben Craven's mods  for details). I'd been considering doing some of these, but whilst researching the subject, I discovered that the currently out of production (as at Nov '18)  Pathfinder 15/15R generally receives a lot more love than the Pathfinder 10. I found schematics for both the PF15 and the PF15R online, and saw that there were a lot of similarities between the PF10 and the PF15, particularly the earlier non-reverb PF15. The PF15R (with reverb) is quite a bit different after the first two opamp stages. I thought I'd model both the PF10 and PF15 pre-amp stages in LTspice  to see how they compar...

Vox Pathfinder 15 Tremolo Repair

Last year, I snapped up a Vox Pathfinder 15 (non-reverb) combo amplifier from ebay. The seller was a charity shop, and the amplifier was listed as "untested", so I was taking a bit of a gamble, but figured I'd have a good chance of being able to fix it it it wasn't working, and cosmetically, it looked almost mint. When it arrived, I plugged it in, and as you guessed, it was not working. Barely any sound, and what sound there was was horribly distorted. One thin I did notice was the the power on LED was not aligned correctly with the hole in the back panel, so I did quickly took it apart, and realigned the potentiometers and LED indicator, but didn't have a look in detail at the circuit. I put it back together, but the problem remained. My guess was that the problem was the famous "cambridgitis" (just google that term and you'll find all about it). Basically, a problem where the optocoupler that controls the tremolo circuit fails. A common failure...

Marshall Lead 12 Preamp Simulation

Having already modelled the preamp stage of the  Vox Pathfinder 10, 15 and 15R  respectively, and noted the similarities circuit-wise between the PF10 and the PF15, I discovered another much-loved practice amp with a similar preamp stage - the Marshall Lead 12. I should say, before going any further, that there are huge differences between the power amp stages. The PF10 uses a TDA2030A chip amp whereas the Lead 12 uses discrete components. The chip amp power stage on the PF10 shouldn't colour the tone much, but the discrete one in the Lead 12 most likely does contribute to the overall tone of the amplifier. A simulation of the preamp stage with the Treble, Bass and Mid controls at 50% and the Gain control at 0%-100% gave this Marshall Lead 12 Preamp Simulation Marshall Lead 12 preamp simulation, Gain 0%-100%, TMB @ 50% Vox Pathfinder 10 preamp simulation (overdrive engaged) Vov Pathfinder 10 preamp simulation, Gain 0%-100%, T+B @ 50% Comparing the two, ...